Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2025 3 • VG SZ I 2025 3 Structuré par IA

I 2025 3 — Appellant v. Social Insurance Office: Vocational Rehabilitation Denial Appeal

Numéro de cause I 2025 3 (SZ_VG_003_I-2025-3_2025-05-14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Miroir Entscheidsuche ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

The appellant sought vocational rehabilitation measures under invalid insurance, claiming a significant reduction in earning capacity following a medical condition, while the social insurance office had denied the request for such measures, maintaining the appellant was not medically fit to pursue rehabilitation or gainful employment. The court reasoned that although the appellant had significant health limitations, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the overall impact of the impairments met the required threshold for granting vocational rehabilitation measures under the applicable law, thus upholding the decision to deny the benefits.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
The appellant sought vocational rehabilitation measures under invalid insurance, claiming a significant reduction in earning capacity following a medical condition, while the social insurance office had denied the request for such measures, maintaining the appellant was not medically fit to pursue rehabilitation or gainful employment. The court reasoned that although the appellant had significant health limitations, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the overall impact of the impairments met the required threshold for granting vocational rehabilitation measures under the applicable law, thus upholding the decision to deny the benefits.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2025 3

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2025 3 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Mai 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. F.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: