Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2024 13 • VG SZ I 2024 13 Rejeté (Dismissed) Structuré par IA

I 2024 13 — Insurance Causation Dispute Affirming Rejection of Compensation Claim

Numéro de cause I 2024 13 (SZ_VG_003_I-2024-13_2024-06-10)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Miroir Entscheidsuche ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

The case involves a dispute over accident insurance causation where the appellant sought compensation for an alleged work-related accident. The court determined that the appellant failed to establish the necessary causal link between the reported event and the resulting health impairment, finding that the medical evidence did not sufficiently support the claim that the alleged work accident was the factual or a significant contributing cause of the current physical condition, thus affirming the lower authority's rejection of the claim.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG; Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG — Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG: The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible because it concerns a decision concerning the application of the Code of Social Insurance. Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG: The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.

Questions juridiques clés & dispositions appliquées

Structuré par IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible because it concerns a decision concerning the application of the Code of Social Insurance.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees because the appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2024 13

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2024 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n