Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Décisions judiciaires Legislation Analyser dans Legislator
I 2023 79 • VG SZ I 2023 79 Structuré par IA

I 2023 79 — Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Causal Link to Disability

Numéro de cause I 2023 79 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-79_2024-07-08)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Miroir Entscheidsuche ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

An individual appealed a decision concerning accident insurance benefits, where the core dispute involved the causal link between an alleged work accident and the resulting disability claim. The court reasoned that for a claim to be granted under accident insurance, the alleged harmful event must have demonstrably caused the asserted health impairment, and since the medical evidence failed to establish a necessary or even likely causal relationship between the reported incident and the claimant's ongoing physical complaints, the appeal against the prior rejection of benefits was ultimately dismissed.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG; Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG; Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG; Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG — Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury. Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link. Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG: The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.

Questions juridiques clés & dispositions appliquées

Structuré par IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of an occupational illness/injury.

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the lack of factual basis for establishing the causal link.

Art. 65 Abs. 3 BVG

The court dismissed the appeal, citing this provision regarding the non-establishment of a significant causal link.

Art. 106 Abs. 1 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 BVG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the respondent legal costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2023 79

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungsanspruch / Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: