Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
I 2023 53 • VG SZ I 2023 53 Généré par l'IA

I 2023 53 — Occupational Accident Disability Assessment Appeal

Numéro de cause I 2023 53 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-53_2024-04-11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a dispute over a final assessment that imposed liability for an occupational accident, where the appellant argued that the subsequent medical findings did not support the initial assessment's conclusion regarding the level of disability and related insurance payments. The court reasoned that the administrative body's determination, based on the expert medical opinions available at the time of the assessment, was factually sound and legally compliant, thus affirming the challenged decision because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the original medical assessment contained demonstrable errors or that later, contradictory medical evidence was so conclusive as to invalidate the initial administrative finding.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Généré par l'IA
The appeal concerned a dispute over a final assessment that imposed liability for an occupational accident, where the appellant argued that the subsequent medical findings did not support the initial assessment's conclusion regarding the level of disability and related insurance payments. The court reasoned that the administrative body's determination, based on the expert medical opinions available at the time of the assessment, was factually sound and legally compliant, thus affirming the challenged decision because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the original medical assessment contained demonstrable errors or that later, contradictory medical evidence was so conclusive as to invalidate the initial administrative finding.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2023 53

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 53 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n