Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Décisions judiciaires Legislation Analyser dans Legislator
I 2022 33 • VG SZ I 2022 33 Rejeté (Dismissed) Structuré par IA

I 2022 33 — Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity

Numéro de cause I 2022 33 (SZ_VG_003_I-2022-33_2022-08-29)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Miroir Entscheidsuche ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

The appellant sought a disability pension from the disability insurance office, which the office rejected, leading to an appeal. The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
The appellant sought a disability pension from the disability insurance office, which the office rejected, leading to an appeal. The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2022 33

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: