Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep I R 78/2005 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2005:I.R.78.2005 Généré par l'IA

Court rejects transfer of venue based solely on complainant's dissatisfaction with specific judges.

Numéro de cause Sklep I R 78/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The defendant requested a transfer of the case to another court due to alleged bias by judges in the Ljubljana District Court. The Supreme Court found this dissatisfaction insufficient to meet the statutory requirements for changing venue. Consequently, the request was dismissed because personal grievances do not constitute the clear reasons mandated by law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A party's dissatisfaction with specific judges does not constitute a valid ground for transferring a case to another court unless it is evident that the proceedings would be conducted more easily or other significant reasons exist.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transfer of venue judicial bias civil procedure law change of court party's dissatisfaction transmission pour cause d'incompétence délégation de possession décision préfectorale de renvoi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
Sklep I R 148/2008
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction based solely on a general claim to a fair trial.
VSRS sklep I R 150/2014
Supreme Court rejects debtor's request to delegate jurisdiction due to procedural delays, citing lack of objective impartiality grounds.
VSRS Sklep III R 30/2025
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction due to appearance of bias from connected court's alleged misconduct.
VSRS Sklep I R 164/2021
Supreme Court transfers case jurisdiction due to compromised impartiality appearance between plaintiff judge and court judges.
VSRS Sklep III R 24/2022
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request based on alleged judicial bias and lack of natural judge rights.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlogu se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Predlagateljevo nezadovoljstvo v zvezi s sodniki določenega sodišča ne predstavlja razloga za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Toženec je predlagal določitev drugega "stvarno in krajevno pristojnega sodišča", ker je prepričan, da Okrožno sodišče v Kranju o njegovih zadevah "ni sposobno sodelovati niti pošteno niti nepristransko", ker ima predlagatelj slabe izkušnje z določenimi sodniki navedenega sodišča v dosedanjih sodnih postopkih.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP, Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče za izvedbo postopka, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi.

Predlagateljevo nezadovoljstvo v zvezi s kranjskimi sodniki ne sovpada z nobeno od predpostavk iz 67. člena ZPP in zato predlogu ni mogoče ugoditi.