Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 226/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:II.DOR.226.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses leave for appeal request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under ZPP Art. 367.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 226/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the applicants' request for leave to appeal, confirming the lower court's dismissal of the will invalidity claim. The applicants argued for a review of the will's validity, but the Supreme Court found that the legal prerequisites for granting leave to appeal were not met. Consequently, the request was dismissed pursuant to the specific provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding appellate review thresholds.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 367.1, 367.c ZPP: The Supreme Court rejects a request for leave to appeal when the statutory conditions for such leave are not fulfilled.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
leave to appeal Code of Civil Procedure will invalidity appellate review statutory conditions Supreme Court dismissal of request chances de succès du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 367.1 ZPP
Art. 367.c ZPP
Généré par l'IA
VSRS Sklep II DoR 202/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request withdrawal and orders partial court fee payment.
VSL sklep II Cp 1398/2012
Appeal allowed; court rejects premature evidence assessment and mandates reformulation of claim under material procedural leadership.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1761/2025
Appeal dismissed; claim rejected for being improperly filed as declaratory instead of voiding action.
Sklep II DoR 170/2009
Supreme Court dismisses late appeal permission request due to late filing and lack of obvious error.
VSL Sklep I Cp 387/2019
Appeal court vacates inheritance judgment due to insufficient evidence on testamentary capacity and remands case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožnikov in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, s katero je bil zavrnjen tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev neveljavnosti oporoke.

2. Zoper navedeno sodbo sta prva in druga tožnica vložili predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).