Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep VIII DoR 107/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:VIII.DOR.107.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application as no conditions for review under ZPP Article 367a are met.

Numéro de cause Sklep VIII DoR 107/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the final judgment. The first-instance court ordered the defendant to pay 11,125.62 EUR plus interest, taxes, and costs, which the second-instance court upheld. The Supreme Court found that the conditions for allowing a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review application is dismissed when the applicant fails to demonstrate that the decision is legally erroneous or that there are other statutory grounds for review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
review application Civil Procedure Act final judgment legal error second instance supreme court dismissed créance contestée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
VSK Sodba I Cp 26/2019
Appeal partially allowed; mental pain damages reduced; property damages upheld for future period.
VSL sodba II Cp 1358/2016
Appeal dismissed; notarial deed is mandatory form for share transfer agreement validity under Slovenian law.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 323/2021
Appeal court dismissed damages claim for insult as plaintiff failed to prove employer's malicious intent.
VSL sklep I Cpg 182/2016
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by failing to remand case for proper claim individualization.
VSL sodba II Cp 1658/2015
State liability dismissed; qualified fault required for administrative acts causing damage.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, da je tožena stranka dolžna tožniku izplačati 11.125,62 EUR z zakonskimi obrestmi in na tako izplačan znesek obračunati davke in prispevke ter odmerjene stroške postopka. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.