Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 73/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.73.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application as procedural conditions under ZPP Art. 367a are not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 73/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's application for review of the second-instance judgment regarding a compensation claim for occupational exposure to isocyanates. The defendant argued that objective liability should be replaced by fault-based liability for the specific damages claimed. The court dismissed the application because the statutory conditions for admitting a review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the conditions for its admission under Article 367a are not met, regardless of the substantive arguments regarding liability principles.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Code of Civil Procedure review application admission conditions occupational liability isocyanate exposure supreme court dismissed application notion de maladie professionnelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
VSRS Sklep VIII Ips 123/2018
Supreme Court allows appeal in occupational disease case, remanding for new assessment of disability percentage.
Sodba VIII Ips 19/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in lead poisoning case, upholding lower court's compensation award based on objective conditions.
VDSS Sodba Psp 145/2024
Appeal dismissed; work injury caused swelling deemed valid reason for reduced work capacity periods.
Sodba VIII Ips 302/2004
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal in work injury case due to lack of causal link between job and illness.
Sodba II Ips 305/2005
Appeal dismissed; evidence value depends on content; causation not proven between nickel allergy and work exposure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Odškodninski spor - pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP niso podani.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnica je s tožbo zahtevala odškodnino za premoženjsko in za nepremoženjsko škodo, ki je posledica bolezni zaradi (dolgotrajne) izpostavljenosti izocianatom v času zaposlitve pri toženi stranki. Sodišče prve stopnje je z vmesno sodbo odločilo, da je temelj toženkine odškodninske odgovornosti podan, sodišče druge stopnje pa je vmesno sodbo prvostopenjskega sodišča potrdilo.

2. Tožena stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje. Meni, da za tožničino škodo ni objektivno odgovorna ter da je treba v konkretnem primeru vzročnost presojati po načelu krivde.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče skladno z določbo drugega odstavka 367.c člena istega zakona predlog zavrnilo.