Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 34/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.34.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application because statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 34/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance court's decision. The applicant sought to overturn a ruling that had annulled the first-instance judgment following their appeal. The court denied the request because the legal requirements for admitting a review under the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

367.a(1) ZPP; 367.c(2) ZPP: A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admission are not met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
review application admissibility requirements Code of Civil Procedure second instance decision annulment of judgment procédure de révision modification des mesures provisionnelles modification de la demande

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
367.a(1) ZPP
367.c(2) ZPP
Généré par l'IA
Sklep II Ips 471/93
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against enforcement ruling, allowing only appeal against rejection of that appeal.
Sklep III DoR 85/2013
Supreme Court dismisses lay revision proposal due to lack of legal qualification and postulatory capacity.
Sklep II DoR 213/2011
Supreme Court dismisses review application due to lack of lawyer qualification proof under ZPP.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 148/2019
Supreme Court rejects review request due to lack of lawyer qualification and procedural bar in enforcement proceedings.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 241/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of standing as non-lawyer without bar exam.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker zakonski pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje, s katerim je bilo ugodeno toženkini pritožbi in je bil sklep sodišča prve stopnje o popravi sodbe razveljavljen.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).