Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep VIII DoR 5/2009-6 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:VIII.DOR.5.2009.6 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application because applicant failed to meet statutory admissibility conditions under ZPP Article 367a.

Numéro de cause Sklep VIII DoR 5/2009-6
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to overturn a decision denying their claim for unpaid tax deducted from family pension, arguing the lower court erred in law. The court dismissed the request because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the conditions for admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were met.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to establish the statutory conditions for its permission under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
review application admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure tax deduction family pension modification de l'entretien après divorce révocation de rentes sociales déduction du loyer dans les prestations complémentaires

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
VDSS sodba Psp 108/2012
Social court dismisses appeal, ruling pension calculation must use most favorable variant for claimant rights.
VDSS sodba Psp 178/2016
Appeal dismissed; prior court reversal does not constitute unlawful conduct for pension recalculation claims.
VSRS Sodba VIII Ips 114/2018
Supreme Court dismisses pension revision appeal, upholding final 1999 pension decision against retroactive claims.
Sklep VIII Ips 266/2010
Supreme Court allows review, voids lower court ruling on unpaid funds and interest due to unjust enrichment.
VDSS Sodba Psp 129/2022
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff lacks required pension contribution history to meet statutory retirement age conditions.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Za dopustitev revizije mora stranka izkazati obstoj pogojev iz 367a. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožeča stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bilo ugodeno pritožbi tožene stranke in sodba sodišča prve stopnje spremenjena tako, da se zahtevek tožeče stranke za plačilo odtegnjenega zneska dohodnine, obračunane pri izplačilu družinske pokojnine tožnikoma, zavrne.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367a. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi prvega in drugega odstavka 367c. člena ZPP predlog zavrnilo.