Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II DoR 1/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.1.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review request as statutory conditions for review under ZPP are not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II DoR 1/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to allow a review of the second-instance judgment. The lower courts had placed the minor children in the mother's care and ordered the father to pay alimony after he acknowledged paternity. The Supreme Court found that the specific conditions required to permit a review under the first paragraph of Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied, leading to the dismissal of the request.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review request is inadmissible when the statutory conditions for its allowance under the first paragraph of Article 367a are not met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Code of Civil Procedure review request alimony obligation paternity acknowledgment minor children custody Supreme Court review procedural admissibility droit aux allocations familiales

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
VSL Sodba IV Cp 1100/2021
Court upholds father's visitation rights despite mother's alienation claims, rejecting remote-only contact requirement.
VSC sklep Cp 16/2008
Appeal allowed; child custody decision reversed for failure to explain reasoning and assess current circumstances.
VSL sklep IV Cp 292/2015
Appeal dismissed; temporary alimony for minor child requires urgent threat to survival, not just financial need.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1285/2019
Appeal dismissed; temporary support order rejected due to insufficient factual basis for preventing irreparable harm to child.
VSL sodba IV Cp 3119/2014
Appeal dismissed; court upheld custody transfer to father due to mother's unreasonably blocking contact.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP niso podani.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog se zavrne.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je mladoletna T. R. in S. R., ki ju je 13. 11. 2007 izven zakona rodila M. R., očetovstvo pa je z izjavo pri pristojnem centru za socialno delo priznal R. P., dodelilo v varstvo in vzgojo materi, očeta pa zavezalo zanju plačevati preživnino. Sodišče druge stopnje je takšno sodbo potrdilo.

2. R. P. je Vrhovnemu sodišču predlagal, naj zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje dopusti revizijo.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče toženčev predlog zavrnilo (tretji odstavek 367. člena ZPP).