Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II Dor 21/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.21.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses revision request due to failure to meet statutory conditions under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Numéro de cause Sklep II Dor 21/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a revision against the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to challenge the partial denial of an alimony increase, arguing procedural errors in the lower courts' decisions. The court dismissed the request because the applicant failed to satisfy the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A revision request is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision violates the law or contains a significant error in fact-finding.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
revision request Civil Procedure Act alimony increase second instance judgment statutory conditions motifs de révision révision du plan d'affectation révision de traité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
Sklep III DoR 42/2012
Appeal dismissed partially; Supreme Court allows review regarding procedural violation on claim amount.
Sklep II DoR 185/2010
Supreme Court dismisses late application for leave to appeal as it was filed outside the 30-day statutory deadline.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep II DoR 551/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to late payment of court fees under ZPP Article 105a(3).
Sklep X Ips 860/2007
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of serious legal issue and severe consequences under Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje s katero je bilo delno ugodeno tožnikovi pritožbi proti zavrnilnemu delu prvostopenjske sodbe v zvezi z zahtevanim zvišanjem preživnine.

2. Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.