Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Sklep II Dor 9/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.9.2009 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility under ZPP are not met.

Numéro de cause Sklep II Dor 9/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to admit a review against the second-instance judgment. The defendant argued for overturning the lower court's order to remove encroachments on the plaintiff's property, but the court found the statutory prerequisites for a review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were absent. Consequently, the application was dismissed because the necessary conditions for granting a review were not satisfied.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admission under the first paragraph of Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure are not met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Code of Civil Procedure review application admissibility conditions property rights encroachment removal procédure de révision action en raison du trouble de la possession révision du plan d'affectation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
Sodba III Ips 73/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against bank liability for fraud where documents appeared genuine and AML reporting was complete.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 78/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of standing for non-lawyer applicant.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 536/2020
Appeal dismissed because applicant failed to prove she holds a valid lawyer's state exam license.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1014/2019
Appeal dismissed; non-lawyer self-representation in Supreme Court review rejected under ZPP rules.
VSL Sodba II Cp 749/2020
Appeal court reverses first instance ruling, dismissing plaintiff's claim for ownership based on adverse possession and contract ratification.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena ZPP niso podani.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bila zavrnjena njegova pritožba zoper sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, s katero mu je bilo naloženo opustiti vsakršno poseganje v lastninsko pravico tožnice na parceli št. 1593 k.o. ... ter v okviru tega odstraniti kole in žično ograjo s severnega dela navedene parcele ob parcelah št. 1591 in 1592.

2. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju: ZPP) niso podani. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog zavrnilo (tretji odstavek 367. člena ZPP).