Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
Sodba II Ips 951/2006 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:II.IPS.951.2006 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal upholding buyer's title over seller's defective ownership in enforcement proceedings.

Numéro de cause Sodba II Ips 951/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Slovénie (SI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's appeal, confirming the lower courts' decision that the enforcement buyer acquired original ownership rights. The appellant, a co-owner, argued that the court erred in allowing a sale by a non-disposing co-owner and failed to provide clear reasoning. The court ruled that the enforcement sale was legally effective because the buyer acted in good faith and the land registry's protection of bona fide acquisition takes precedence over the co-owner's lack of disposal capacity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 42 of the Property Act; Article 10 of the Property Act; Article 8 of the Land Register Act: Original ownership is acquired by a buyer in enforcement proceedings if the buyer acts in good faith, and the protection of bona fide acquisition in the land registry prevails over the seller's lack of disposal capacity.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
enforcement proceedings original ownership acquisition lack of disposal capacity bona fide acquisition land registry protection co-owner rights property law statut juridique antérieur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 42 of the Property Act
Article 10 of the Property Act
Article 8 of the Land Register Act
Article 14, paragraph 2, point 2 of Section 339 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 165, paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 154, paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
Case II Ips 505/2003
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revizija se zavrne.

Tožeča stranka mora toženi stranki v 15 dneh povrniti 465,18 EUR stroškov odgovora na revizijo z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi, ki tečejo od 16. dne od vročitve te sodbe.

[JEDRO]

Tožeča stranka je sicer lastniški posestnik spornega stanovanja, na njem pa zaradi pomanjkanja razpolagalne sposobnosti prodajalcev ni mogla pridobiti lastninske pravice, zato je treba dati prednost toženi stranki – kupcu stanovanja v izvršilnem postopku, ki je na njem izvirno pridobila lastninsko pravico.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]