Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
B 4656-25 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows one-year-four-month prison sentence for mother with four children, rejecting billiness grounds.

Numéro de cause B 4656-25
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suède (SE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court upheld a one-year-and-four-month prison sentence imposed on a mother with sole custody of four children. The appellant argued that the sentence violated principles of proportionality and fairness given her family circumstances. The court rejected these claims, ruling that the statutory sentencing guidelines and the severity of the offense outweighed the billiness considerations in this specific instance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Penal Code Chapter 26 § 1; Chapter 26 § 2: The court established that while family circumstances may influence sentencing, they do not automatically preclude a custodial sentence if the offense warrants it under the statutory framework.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
custodial sentence family circumstances proportionality principle sole custody billiness grounds penal code sentencing guidelines fixation de peine des mineurs

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Chapter 26 § 1 of the Penal Code
Chapter 26 § 2 of the Penal Code
Généré par l'IA
B 2111-03
Court imposes conditional sentence with community service instead of prison for theft due to family circumstances.
B 697-07
Court reduces closed youth care sentence for minor robber due to statutory youth mitigation rules.
B 3671-07
Court orders closed youth care instead of prison for a 15-year-old due to crime severity.
B 501-07
Appellate court reduces sentence from prison to supervised release due to low criminal value and defendant's age.
B 7-07
Youth court replaces prison sentence with closed youth care due to statutory reduction for age.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

I målet har klaganden dömts till fängelse i ett år och fyra månader. Hon har ensam vårdnad om fyra barn. Målet aktualiserar frågor om beaktande av så kallade billighetsskäl vid påföljdsbestämningen. (Svea hovrätt, mål B 1427-25)