Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
A 81-19 Généré par l'IA

Employment tribunal dismissed claimant's appeal for non-compliance with procedural response deadline requirements.

Numéro de cause A 81-19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suède (SE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Employment Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant's appeal against a labor court decision regarding dismissal. The claimant argued that the dismissal was unlawful, but the court found the appeal inadmissible because the claimant failed to submit a complete response to a formal directive within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as procedurally defective, leaving the original dismissal decision standing.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 1 §; Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 2 §: Failure to comply with a directive to submit a complete response renders an appeal inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
employment appeal procedural deadline inadmissible appeal complete response formal directive dismissal case labor court demande de prestation d'assurance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 1 §
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 2 §
Généré par l'IA
A 67-19
Arbetsdomstolen allowed wage claim because defendant failed to respond to a court order.
A 87-21
Employment tribunal dismissed claimant's appeal for failure to respond to a formal notice within the deadline.
A 95-18
Swedish labor court dismissed union's claim for refusal of negotiation due to defendant's failure to answer a court order.
A 33-23
Arbetsdomstolen dismissed the claim because the respondent failed to answer the court's order to respond to the case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Svenska Målareförbundet

mot

A.R.G Takmåleri och Service AB i konkurs.

Målet gällde avskedande m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge fullständigt svaromål.

Dom 2019-12-20, målnummer A-81-2019

Ledamot: Cathrine Lilja Hansson

Rättssekreterare: Pontus Bromander