Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
A 12-20 Généré par l'IA

Union's claim dismissed because the defendant was absent from the court hearing.

Numéro de cause A 12-20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suède (SE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Arbitration Court of Sweden dismissed the union's claim against the defendant due to the defendant's absence from the hearing. The plaintiff, Service- and Communications Union, sought various demands, but the court noted the defendant failed to appear. Consequently, the claim was rejected as the procedural defect prevented the court from addressing the merits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 1 §; 1 kap. 2 §: If a party is absent from the hearing, the court may dismiss the claim without examining the substantive merits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Arbitration Court of Sweden party absence dismissal of claim procedural default union dispute motif intervenu après la fuite action en dommages-intérêts pour séquestre préjudice imminent

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 1 §
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 2 §
Généré par l'IA
A 98-19
Claim dismissed because defendant was absent from court proceedings without valid excuse.
Ö 3863-02
Supreme Court grants leave to appeal due to valid excuse of severe mental illness preventing attendance.
A 110-20
Claim dismissed because defendant failed to respond to a court order to answer the case.
A 144-23
Arbetsdomstolen dismissed the claim because the respondent failed to answer the court's summons within the deadline.
Ö 1064-99
Court dismissed appeal; death of father did not excuse failure to appear without prior notice.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Seko, Service- och kommunikationsfacket

mot

K.M.

Målet gällde fordran m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av svarandens utevaro vid förhandling i domstolen.

Dom 2021-05-12, målnummer A-12-2020

Ledamot: Karin Renman

Rättssekreterare: Jonas Eklund