Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
Încheierea nr. 7162/2012 Généré par l'IA

Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 7162/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the applicant’s request to transfer case file no. 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 al. 1 LTF; Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns: 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motifs de cassation griefs de procédure conflit de compétence civile audience publique e-justice revirement de jurisprudence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF
The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF

The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

S-a luat în examinare cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petenta și intimata D.L.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror A.B.

Procedura este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată al instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați, a cărui strămutare se cere, are termen de judecată la data de 2 aprilie 2013.

Procurorul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 21 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AS