Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3249/2013 Généré par l'IA

Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 3249/2013
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for transfer of jurisdiction, meaning the request to move the trial failed and the case remains before the Court of First Instance where it was originally filed. The dispute concerned a procedural motion by the plaintiffs to relocate the trial of civil case no. 3838/212/2011 from the Constanța Court of Appeal to another competent court. The court rejected the application after the public prosecutor’s representative argued against the transfer, finding no grounds to disturb the existing judicial allocation; the decision was issued without recourse as it was a final procedural order.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Fără cale de atac; Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial: The dispute concerned a procedural motion by the plaintiffs to relocate the trial of civil case no. 3838/212/2011 from the Constanța Court of Appeal to another competent court. The court rejected the application after the public prosecutor’s representative argued against the transfer, finding no grounds to disturb the existing judicial allocation; the decision was issued without recourse as it was a final procedural order.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
chefs de compétence contestation civile griefs de procédure transfert de garde décisions portant réaffectation ou mutation classement définitif de la procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Fără cale de atac
Procedural provision indicating that the decision is final and no further appeal is permitted against this procedural ruling.
Généré par l'IA
Încheierea nr. 4954/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction between courts: dismissal of petition for lack of grounds to relocate civil proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3919/2013
Petition for transfer of jurisdiction from Court of Appeal to another instance; rejection due to lack of legal grounds despite valid procedure.
Încheierea nr. 3209/2013
Petition for transfer of civil case jurisdiction dismissed for failure to meet procedural admissibility requirements
Încheierea nr. 2694/2013
Jurisdictional transfer of civil case; failure of statutory grounds for reassignment
Încheierea nr. 5998/2012
Judicial transfer request for civil litigation: adequacy of grounds for jurisdictional relocation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Fără cale de atac

Procedural provision indicating that the decision is final and no further appeal is permitted against this procedural ruling.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are fixat termen la data de 10 septembrie 2013.

Se mai referă și că petenții au depus taxa judiciară de timbru și timbrul judiciar aferent și precizări însoțite de înscrisuri.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare formulată de petenți, pentru motivele expuse verbal.

Analizând cererea.

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenții M.I. și M.M., prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3838/212/2011 al Tribunalului Constanța.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 iunie 2013.