Transfer of civil case jurisdiction: Competence determination under appeal court transfer (strămutare) procedures
Roumanie (RO)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) admitted the petition filed by the plaintiffs and ordered the transfer of jurisdiction for Case No. 1342/99/2012 from the Civil Section of the Iași Court of Appeal to the Brașov Court of Appeal, retaining all procedural acts previously undertaken, a final and unappealable decision. The dispute concerned a request for *strămutare* (transfer of a pending case), where the public prosecutor argued against the motion as unfounded, but the court considered the procedural posture, including the scheduled hearing date of January 18, 2013, and the timely submission of written conclusions and supporting documents by the plaintiffs via fax and postal service. The legal basis for the ruling rests on the procedural authority of the ICCJ to determine the competent court for hearing civil cases through the mechanism of transferring jurisdiction to ensure proper administration of justice, resulting in the displacement of the original court's competence in favor of the designated alternative appellate court.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IATransfer of civil case jurisdiction: Competence determination under appeal court transfer (strămutare) procedures: 1342/99/2012 from the Civil Section of the Iași Court of Appeal to the Brașov Court of Appeal, retaining all procedural acts previously undertaken, a final and unappealable decision. The dispute concerned a request for *strămutare* (transfer of a pending case), where the public prosecutor argued against the motion as unfounded, but the court considered the procedural posture, including the scheduled hearing date of January 18, 2013, and the timely submission of written conclusions and supporting documents by the plaintiffs via fax and postal service. The legal basis for the ruling rests on the procedural authority of the ICCJ to determine the competent court for hearing civil cases through the mechanism of transferring jurisdiction to ensure proper administration of justice, resulting in the displacement of the original court's competence in favor of the designated alternative appellate court.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 1342/99/2012 al Curții de Apel Iași, secția civilă, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată stabilit la data de 18 ianuarie 2013.
De asemenea, se referă faptul că petenții au depus concluzii scrise, prin fax la data de 11 ianuarie 2013, precum și prin serviciul poștal la data de 12 ianuarie 2013, acest din urmă exemplar având atașate înscrisuri în susținerea cererii de strămutare.
Reprezentantul Ministerului Public formulează concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.
Analizând cererea,
ÎNALTA CURTE
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D I S P U N E
Admite cererea formulată de petenții M.M., M.C.N., M.A.B. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1342/99/2012 al Curții de Apel Iași, secția civilă,
Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Iași, secția civilă, la Curtea de Apel Brașov.
Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.
Fără cale de atac.
Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 15 ianuarie 2013.