Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
Încheierea nr. 1731/2013 Généré par l'IA

Transfer request mooted by underlying case closure; petition dismissed as inadmissible for review.

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 1731/2013
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as moot the petitioner’s application to transfer (strămutare) the case in Docket No. 10057/318/2007 of the Gorj Tribunal, because that underlying case had already been resolved on 20 February 2013; the dismissal leaves the prior resolution in force, and no appeal lies. The petition sought a change of venue based on repeated allegations of bias, but the court found the transfer request had lost its purpose once the docket was definitively closed. Legally, the ruling rests on the principle that a motion to transfer a case becomes moot when the case itself is no longer pending, thereby barring any further review.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 144 Cod procedură civilă; Transfer request mooted by underlying case closure; petition dismissed as inadmissible for review: 10057/318/2007 of the Gorj Tribunal, because that underlying case had already been resolved on 20 February 2013; the dismissal leaves the prior resolution in force, and no appeal lies. The petition sought a change of venue based on repeated allegations of bias, but the court found the transfer request had lost its purpose once the docket was definitively closed. Legally, the ruling rests on the principle that a motion to transfer a case becomes moot when the case itself is no longer pending, thereby barring any further review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
revirement de jurisprudence transfert devenu sans objet examen en cassation principe d'allégation retrait de la requête décisions portant réaffectation ou mutation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 144 Cod procedură civilă
Basis for rejecting the request for transfer of case because it became moot, the underlying case had already been decided.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 144 Cod procedură civilă

Basis for rejecting the request for transfer of case because it became moot, the underlying case had already been decided.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, pe rolul secției a II-a civilă petenta a depus mai multe cereri de strămutare pentru aceleași motive, dar în alte dosare. Potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se cere a fost soluționat la data de 20 februarie 2013.

Avocat C.R.P. depune la dosar note scrise și un set de înscrisuri în copie și solicită admiterea cererii, susținând motivele scrise.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC L. SA prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 10057/318/2007 al Tribunalului Gorj.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 27 martie 2013.