Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1453/2012 Généré par l'IA

Venue change request for resolved appeal and associated lack of defense petition rejected under Article 156(1) of the Civil Procedure Code

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 1453/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition to change the venue of a pending civil case, ruling that the request was unfounded and the subsequent request for a new hearing due to lack of defense was also rejected, leaving the original case with the Court of Appeal of Suceava as the competent forum. The dispute involved a petitioner who filed for venue change and, after learning the original case had already been resolved by the lower court on February 22, 2012, subsequently requested a new hearing to prepare a defense, claiming the summons procedure was legally fulfilled but seeking relief from the procedural situation. The court's decisive legal basis was Article 156(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the panel applied to determine that the petition for lack of defense lacked merit given the established timeline and procedural history.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 156 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Venue change request for resolved appeal and associated lack of defense petition rejected under Article 156(1) of the Civil Procedure Code: The dispute involved a petitioner who filed for venue change and, after learning the original case had already been resolved by the lower court on February 22, 2012, subsequently requested a new hearing to prepare a defense, claiming the summons procedure was legally fulfilled but seeking relief from the procedural situation. The court's decisive legal basis was Article 156(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the panel applied to determine that the petition for lack of defense lacked merit given the established timeline and procedural history.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
code de procédure civile citation à comparaître qualité pour recourir revirement de jurisprudence e-justice procédure d'opposition

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 156 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for rejecting the petition for lack of defense and the subsequent venue change request.
Généré par l'IA
Încheierea nr. 1421/2013
Request for change of venue denied; petition dismissed without appeal
Încheierea nr. 4131/2013
Denial of civil change of venue request in pending appellate proceedings
Încheierea nr. 7057/2012
Request for change of venue in civil proceedings: rejection for lack of statutory grounds
Încheierea nr. 6649/2012
Transfer of venue request denied due to failure to establish grounds for judicial relocation
Încheierea nr. 7130/2012
Change of venue petition denied due to procedural suspension of the underlying civil case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 156 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for rejecting the petition for lack of defense and the subsequent venue change request.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul-asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 871/86/2010 al Curții de Apel Suceava a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat la data de 22 februarie 2012. Se mai referă că petentul a solicitat acordarea unui nou termen de judecată pentru pregătirea apărării, prin cererea înregistrată la 1 martie 2012.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public solicită să se respingă cererea formulată de petent.

Deliberând, Înalta Curte respinge cererea de acordare a unui nou termen de judecată pentru lipsă de apărare formulată de petentul D.I.C., constatând că nu este întemeiată, în raport de dispozițiile art. 156 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca fiind rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul D.I.C. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 871/86/2010 al Curții de Apel Suceava.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 1 martie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - NN