Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ICCJ_86888 Généré par l'IA

Transitional penalty recalculation for final convictions barred by res judicata

Numéro de cause ICCJ_86888
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, ruling on a preliminary question referred by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, admitted the referral and held that the provisions of Article 22(4)(b) of Law No. 187/2012, implementing the new Criminal Code (with reference to Article 129(2)(b) of that Code), are not applicable to offenses finally decided as of 1 February 2014. The ruling, binding under Article 477(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, resolves a interpretative conflict over whether the transitional law on the recalculation of the maximum penalty for multiple offenses could be applied retroactively to already-final judgments. The Court reasoned that the transitional provision could not alter final judgments, thereby prevailing the principle of res judicata and the non-retroactivity of criminal law as applied to settled cases.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Transitional penalty recalculation for final convictions barred by res judicata: 187/2012, implementing the new Criminal Code (with reference to Article 129(2)(b) of that Code), are not applicable to offenses finally decided as of 1 February 2014. The ruling, binding under Article 477(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, resolves a interpretative conflict over whether the transitional law on the recalculation of the maximum penalty for multiple offenses could be applied retroactively to already-final judgments. The Court reasoned that the transitional provision could not alter final judgments, thereby prevailing the principle of res judicata and the non-retroactivity of criminal law as applied to settled cases.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
sanction pénale chose jugée dispositions transitoires justice transitionnelle rétroactivité de la loi renvoi préjudiciel
Généré par l'IA
ICCJ_86922
Exclusion of transitional minor-offense sentencing rules for final pre-2014 judgments
Decizia nr. 1237/2014
Post-conviction application of a more favorable penal law: exclusion of guilty plea reductions from the statutory maximum recalculation under Article 6
Decizia nr. 2411/2014
Recalculation of resultant criminal sentence under new Penal Code limits due to application of more favorable law post-conviction
Decizia nr. 556/2016
Recalculation of aggregated criminal sentences following reduction of a component penalty by application of more favorable criminal law
ICCJ_86835
Final convictions re-sentenced under new Criminal Code with two-stage penalty comparison; appeal for precedent-setting ruling admitted, mechanism established.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept în materie penală

Minuta deciziei nr.4 Dosar nr. 4/1/2014/HP/P

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București Secţia I Penală prin încheierea din data de 20 februarie 2014, în dosarul nr. 200/93/2014, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a problemei de drept vizând aplicarea dispozițiilor art.22 alin. (4) lit. b) din Legea nr. 187 din 24 octombrie 2012 pentru punerea în aplicare a Legii nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal cu referire la art. 129 alin. (2) lit. b) din Codul penal în cazul faptelor definitiv judecate la data de 1 februarie 2014 şi stabileşte :

”Prevederile art. 22 alin. (4) lit. b) din Legea nr. 187 din 24 octombrie 2012 pentru punerea în aplicare a Legii nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal cu referire la art. 129 alin. (2) lit. b) din Codul penal nu sunt aplicabile faptelor definitiv judecate la data de 1 februarie 2014.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 12 mai 2014.