Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
Încheierea nr. 5948/2012 Généré par l'IA

Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 5948/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) dismissed the motion to transfer case file no. 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 C.pr.civ; Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied: 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transfert devenu sans objet jugement civil retrait de la requête décisions portant réaffectation ou mutation transfert immobilier transfert de garde

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 C.pr.civ
The dispositive rejects the request for transfer of the case, a decision based on the procedural grounds for transfer requests.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 C.pr.civ.

The dispositive rejects the request for transfer of the case, a decision based on the procedural grounds for transfer requests.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost legal timbrată.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost judecat la 6 septembrie 2012, acest aspect reieșind și din adresa din 1 octombrie 2012, prin care petenta a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare ca fiind rămasă fără obiect, întrucât cauza a fost soluționată.

Având cuvântul, procuror A.B. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 7540/318/2010 al Judecătoriei Târgu-Jiu, formulată de petenta SC L. SA.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 octombrie 2012.