Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Încheierea nr. 5524/2012 Généré par l'IA

Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 5524/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Roumanie (RO)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the petition for change of venue (strămutare), transferring the civil trial from the Olt Court of Appeal to the Sibiu Court of Appeal and preserving all procedural acts performed to date. The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ, art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion: The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure contentieuse civile expertise judiciaire motifs de cassation ouverture de la procédure motif de police actes de procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ
1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în baza art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ
Cited in the conclusion of the appellant and implicitly serving as the legal basis for the admission of the change of venue request, as it governs the grounds for transferring jurisdiction.
Généré par l'IA
Încheierea nr. 1000/2014
Motion for change of venue in civil litigation due to suspension of proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3060/2012
Change of venue request: judicial competence of a suspended civil case and preservation of procedural acts
Încheierea nr. 259/2013
Rejection of change of venue motion where underlying civil case was suspended
Încheierea nr. 3741/2012
Change of venue petition for civil case pending at appellate tribunal
Încheierea nr. 1416/2012
Transfer of civil case venue based on procedural suspension

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the conclusion of the appellant and implicitly serving as the legal basis for the admission of the change of venue request, as it governs the grounds for transferring jurisdiction.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în baza art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Apărătorii petentei pun concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare, cu aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ., în sensul desființării încheierii de încuviințare a unei noi expertize.

Intimatul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de preschimbare.

Procurorul pune concluzii de admitere a cererii.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC A. SA privind strămutarea judecății procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt.

Strămută judecata pricinii de la Tribunalul Olt la Tribunalul Sibiu.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 20 septembrie 2012.