Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
706/2020 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal as challenged norm was not part of the lower court's reasoning.

Numéro de cause 706/2020
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against a decision not to know the object of the resource. The appellant argued that a specific norm should have been considered, but the lower court did not include it in its reasoning. The court ruled that since the norm was not part of the 'ratio decidendi' of the contested decision, it could not be subject to constitutional review at this stage.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea b), da CRP; Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP: An appeal against a decision not to know the object of the resource is inadmissible if the challenged norm was not part of the reasoning of the contested decision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
constitutional appeal ratio decidendi non-constitutionality procedural admissibility constitutional review défaut de qualité du procureur méconnaissance des règles de compétence mémoire de recours insuffisant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea b), da CRP
Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP
Généré par l'IA
292/11
Constitutional Court rejects clarification request regarding non-acceptance of tax appeal due to lack of legislative act defining valuation coefficients.
TC_20020446
Constitutional Court dismisses claim for review of summary decision due to lack of procedural opportunity to raise constitutional issues.
39/12
Constitutional Court rejects request to annul summary dismissal for failure to identify specific unconstitutional norms.
94/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for uniformity due to lack of contradictory rulings on constitutionality.
95/2022
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses a second claim against a summary decision as inadmissible and final.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO Nº 749/2022

Processo n.º 706/2020

2.a Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Assunção Raimundo

Acordam na 2.a Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Notificar o Recorrente para, querendo, se pronunciar sobre a eventualidade do não conhecimento do objeto do recurso, em virtude de a norma sindicada não integrar a "ratio decidendi" da decisão recorrida, tendo em conta o momento da sua constituição como arguido e a ausência de conhecimento prévio da autoridade judiciária competente.

*

Lisboa, 4 de novembro de 2022 - Assunção Raimundo - José Eduardo Figueiredo Dias - Pedro Machete

A Relatora atesta o voto de conformidade da Senhora Conselheira Mariana Canotilho e do Senhor Conselheiro António Ascensão Ramos que intervieram por meios telemáticos.

Assunção Raimundo