Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
967/17 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Court admits appeal regarding non-conformity between normative criteria and applied decision in administrative case.

Numéro de cause 967/17
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court admitted the appeal against the administrative court's decision, noting no grounds for dismissal under the relevant procedural law. The relator found no reason to reject the case despite the applicant's argument that the normative criteria used differed from those applied in the lower court's ruling. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal to proceed for a substantive review of the constitutional issues raised.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 78.º-A LTC; Art. 79.º, n.º 1 LTC: The Constitutional Court admits an appeal when the relator finds no procedural grounds for non-admission, even if the applicant argues a discrepancy between normative criteria and the applied decision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Constitutional Court admission of appeal procedural law normative criteria constitutional review demande d'interprétation précision des normes respect du délai de recours

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 78.º-A LTC
Art. 79.º, n.º 1 LTC
Généré par l'IA
476/15
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between questioned interpretation and lower court ratio.
763/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between the normative question and the applied criterion.
959/20
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses request for clarification of a lower court's ruling on normative interpretation.
702/22.0BESNT
Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's correct application of performance-based point allocation rules.
504/07
Constitutional Court rejects request to reform judgment for alleged procedural omission regarding the object of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO N.º 563/2018

Processo n.º 967/17

2.ª Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Maria Clara Sottomayor

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Notifique-se a recorrente para, querendo, se pronunciar sobre a eventualidade de não conhecimento do presente recurso por inutilidade, em virtude de o critério normativo sindicado não coincidir com aquele que foi aplicado na decisão recorrida. Prazo 10 dias.

Lisboa, 7 de novembro de 2018 – Maria Clara Sottomayor (com declaração)- Pedro Machete – Fernando Vaz Ventura – Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Manuel da Costa Andrade

DECLARAÇÃO DE VOTO

Por ora, consigna-se o seguinte:

Ao abrigo do disposto no artigo 78.º-A da LTC, a Relatora não divisou qualquer motivo para a não admissão do recurso, razão porque o admitiu, tendo sido produzidas alegações, ao abrigo do art. 79.º, n.º 1, da LTC, com respeito às questões de constitucionalidade suscitadas a propósito do acórdão do TCA Sul.

Maria Clara Sottomayor