Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
328/2017 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding housing right conditions sine qua non in eviction proceedings.

Numéro de cause 328/2017
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's refusal to recognize a sine qua non condition for the right to housing. The appellant argued that the eviction order violated constitutional protections, but the court found no error in the lower court's reasoning. Consequently, the decision upholding the eviction was confirmed without granting the requested relief.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 24.º da CRP; Art. 62.º da CRP: The right to housing is not absolute and does not preclude lawful eviction proceedings when specific legal conditions are met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
right to housing eviction proceedings sine qua non condition constitutional appeal procedural due process exception d'inconstitutionnalité recours constitutionnel à l'étranger droit d'habitation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 24.º da CRP
Art. 62.º da CRP
Généré par l'IA
918/2022
Constitutional Court dismisses concrete review for challenging judicial interpretation rather than a specific legal norm.
34/12
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses admissibility claim regarding appeal rights for suspended sentences with impossible conditions.
860/11
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for failing to cite specific normative criteria for constitutional review.
279/2024
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses constitutional challenge as ordinary appeal remedies were not exhausted.
132/15
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-admitted appeal due to lack of prior constitutional question raising. The court ruled that the appellant failed to properly raise the specific constitutional issue before the lower court. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as procedurally inadmissible. The decision emphasizes the requirement for a prior, adequate raising of constitutional questions. This ensures judicial efficiency and adherence to procedural rules. The court found the appellant's arguments insufficient to meet the threshold for review. Thus, the constitutional challenge was dismissed without merit. The outcome reinforces strict procedural requirements for constitutional appeals. The ruling clarifies the necessity of precise legal framing in appeals.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO N.º 296/2018

Processo n.º 328/2017

2.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Fernando Ventura

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Notifique-se o recorrente para se pronunciar, querendo, quanto à eventualidade de não conhecimento do recurso, por desconformidade entre a questão normativa colocada à apreciação do Tribunal Constitucional e a ratio decidendi da decisão recorrida. Esta não reconheceu a existência da condição sine quo non no exercício do direito à habitação.

Lisboa, 7 de junho de 2018 - Fernando Vaz Ventura - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Maria Clara Sottomayor - Pedro Machete - Manuel da Costa Andrade