Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
705/2014 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-finality and illegitimacy regarding administrative decisions.

Numéro de cause 705/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by RIPAR against two administrative decisions from the Central Administrative Court of Norte. The court noted the appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decisions were not final and the second question lacked standing under the relevant law. Consequently, the request for constitutional review was rejected without substantive examination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 70(1)(b) LTC; Art. 72(2) LTC: Appeals against non-final administrative decisions are inadmissible due to lack of finality, and questions of constitutionality are inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing under the specific statutory burden.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
constitutional appeal admissibility non-final decision requirement standing illegitimacy administrative law review LTC constitutional review délais de recours recevabilité de la demande de récusation recours constitutionnel à l'étranger

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 70(1)(b) LTC
Art. 72(2) LTC
Art. 3(3) CPC
Généré par l'IA
290/18
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-raise of normative constitutionality question before judgment.
1085/2025
Constitutional court rejects admissibility claim due to failure to exhaust ordinary remedies and insufficient grounds.
324/16
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of unanimity and potential non-consideration of the case object.
653/2025
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses admissibility claim regarding procedural termination of a constitutional appeal.
763/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between the normative question and the applied criterion.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO Nº 262/2017

Processo n.º 705/2014

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Fernando Ventura

(Conselheiro Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro)

Acordam na 2ª secção do Tribunal Constitucional

A autora RIPAR - Associação de Revitalização Integrada de Património em Ambiente Rural interpôs recurso “das decisões proferidas pelo Tribunal Central Administrativo do Norte, nos dias 25.11.2013 e 10.06.2013”, ao abrigo da alínea b) do n.º 1 do artigo 70.º da LTC, com vista à apreciação de duas questões de constitucionalidade.

Perspetivando a eventualidade do recurso não ser conhecido, seja quanto à impugnada decisão do relator no TCAN, por não definitividade, seja quanto à segunda questão de constitucionalidade, por ilegitimidade, face ao ónus imposto pelo n.º 2 do artigo 72.º da LTC, notifique-se a recorrente para, em 10 dias, se pronunciar, querendo (artigo 3.º, n.º 3, do CPC).

Lisboa, 31 de maio de 2017 - Fernando Vaz Ventura - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Pedro Machete - Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro - Manuel da Costa Andrade