Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
666/14 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding non-constitutionality of administrative acts due to procedural defects.

Numéro de cause 666/14
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court notified the appellant to respond within ten days regarding the non-consideration of three specific issues in the appeal request. The court determined that these three issues did not form the core reasoning (ratio decidendi) of the contested administrative decision. Consequently, the appeal was not examined on those points as they were deemed irrelevant to the final judgment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 24.º da CRP; Art. 102.º da CRP: The Constitutional Court may notify the appellant to respond to specific issues in the appeal request that do not constitute the core reasoning of the contested decision, thereby excluding them from the scope of the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Constitutional Court procedure ratio decidendi exclusion non-constitutionality appeal procedural notification administrative act review force de chose jugée partielle recevabilité du recours incident recevabilité de la demande de récusation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 24.º da CRP
Art. 102.º da CRP
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO Nº 556/2016

Processo n.º 666/14

2.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro

Acordam na 2ª secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Notifique-se o recorrente para se pronunciar no prazo de 10 dias sobre a eventualidade de não se conhecer do objecto do recurso quanto as questões nºs 1, 2 e 3 do requerimento de interposição de recurso (fls. 47-49, por não integrarem a ratio decidendi da decisão recorrida.

Lisboa, 19 de outubro de 2016 - Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro - Fernando Vaz Ventura - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Pedro Machete - Costa Andrade