Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
719/15 Généré par l'IA

Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a clerical error regarding the party paying court costs in a judgment.

Numéro de cause 719/15
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional issued a rectification order to correct a clerical error in a previous judgment. The original text incorrectly identified the respondent as the party owing court costs, whereas the correct party was the appellant. The court applied Article 614 of the Code of Civil Procedure to formally amend the decision.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Article 614 of the Code of Civil Procedure; The court has the authority to correct clerical errors in judgments to ensure the accurate identification of the party liable for court costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
clerical error correction court costs liability judgment rectification Code of Civil Procedure party identification error rectification de la décision mise des frais de procédure révision procédurale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Article 614 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 69 of the Law on the Tribunal Constitucional
Généré par l'IA
00628/09.3BEPNF
Court corrects material error in judgment regarding who bears litigation costs after granting appeal.
346/13.8BECTB
Court corrects tax appeal costs order from appellant to respondent due to clerical error under tax procedure code.
TC_20030547
Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling's omission of the court fee amount due to clerical error.
179/19.8T8GRD.C1.S1-A
Portuguese Supreme Court corrects a civil appeal fee order from respondent to appellant via material error amendment.
TC_19990397
Constitutional Court orders payment of court costs to the losing party for omitted fees in a prior judgment.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO Nº 279/2016[1]

Processo nº 719/15

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheira Ana Guerra Martins

Acordam, na 2.ª Secção, do Tribunal Constitucional

Da leitura da parte decisória do acórdão proferido por este Tribunal, nestes autos, em 11 de março de 2016, verifica-se que existe uma inexatidão devido a lapso de escrita.

Importa retificar esta inexatidão, nos termos do artigo 614.º do C.P.C., aplicável ex vi artigo 69.º da LTC.

Onde se lê:

“Custas devidas pelo recorrido, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em 25 UC´s, nos termos do artigo 7.º do Decreto-Lei n.º 303/98, de 7 de outubro.”

Deverá ler-se:

“Custas devidas pelo recorrente, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em 25 UC´s, nos termos do artigo 7.º do Decreto-Lei n.º 303/98, de 7 de outubro.”

Notifique.

Lisboa, 4 de maio de 2016 - Ana Guerra Martins - Fernando Vaz Ventura - João Cura Mariano - Pedro Machete - Joaquim de Sousa Ribeiro

[1] Retifica Acórdão 163/2016, de 11 de março