Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
254/2015 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-constitutionality due to improper procedural submission of the question.

Numéro de cause 254/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Portugal (PT)
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Constitutional Court notified the appellant to respond regarding the rejection of their appeal for non-constitutionality. The court determined that the question of constitutionality was not raised in a procedurally adequate manner as required by law. Consequently, the court decided not to examine the merits of the constitutional complaint.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP; Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP: The Constitutional Court will not examine a constitutional complaint if the question of constitutionality is not raised in a procedurally adequate manner.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Constitutional Court non-constitutionality appeal procedural adequacy improper submission rejection of appeal exceptions procédurales tardives recevabilité de la demande de récusation exception d'inconstitutionnalité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 221.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP
Art. 222.º, n.º 1, alínea a), da CRP
Généré par l'IA
349/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to specify appeal object and raise constitutional issue properly.
290/18
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-raise of normative constitutionality question before judgment.
38/12
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses request to review a conference decision as legally inadmissible.
696/2026
Constitutional court dismisses appeal against summary ruling for failing to review substantive constitutional issues.
1394/2025
Constitutional Court dismisses claim for review of lower court decision due to lack of normative object.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ACÓRDÃO Nº 196/2016

Processo n.º 254/2015

3ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Carlos Fernandes Cadilha

Acordam, na 3.ª Secção, no Tribunal Constitucional

Acordam em notificar o recorrente para se pronunciar, querendo, quanto ao não conhecimento do objeto do recurso por não suscitação da questão de constitucionalidade de modo processualmente adequado

Lisboa, 13 de abril de 2016 - Carlos Fernandes Cadilha - Maria José Rangel de Mesquita - Lino Rodrigues Ribeiro - Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Maria Lúcia Amaral