V KK 158/18
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, ruling that appellate court did not violate ne peius rule by expanding continuous crime description.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a second-instance judgment that expanded the description of a continuous crime. The prosecution argued this violated the ne peius principle by convicting the defendant for acts previously excluded from the charge. The court ruled that such expansion is permissible within a continuous crime's normative unity and does not constitute a procedural violation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 529 k.p.k.: The ne peius rule does not prohibit the appellate court from supplementing the description of a continuous crime with acts previously excluded, provided the normative unity of the crime remains intact.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
continuous crime
ne peius principle
appellate review
procedural dismissal
criminal procedure code
réouverture de la procédure
induction de la justice en erreur
reformatio in pejus
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 529 k.p.k.
Art. 98 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 17 § 1 pkt 11 k.p.k
art. 529 k.p.k
art. 98 § 2 k.p.k
art. 296 § 1 k.k
art. 12 k.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAV KK 356/16
Supreme Court dismissed cassation on procedural grounds despite a sentencing calculation error corrected to the defendant's benefit.
II KK 183/14
Supreme Court quashes appeal court verdict for omitting prior acquittal facts violating procedural law.
V KZP 25/90
II KR 33/84
I KZP 15/07
Final conviction for continuous crimes does not bar later prosecution for newly revealed acts within the same continuous act.
I KZP 29/01
Final conviction for continuous crime blocks retrial for later revealed acts under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAIII KS 50/24
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against acquittal, ruling lower court could not convict due to ne bis in idem ban.
V KK 252/24
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for increasing criminal measures from 2 to 3 years without defendant's objection.
IV KK 375/23
Supreme Court dismisses request to suspend execution of criminal judgment due to lack of clear grounds and exceptional consequences.
III KK 202/25
Criminal appeal dismissed because appeal on behalf of convicted person requires imprisonment sentence without probation. Defense failed to prove judge bias.
III KS 3/22
Supreme Court dismissed appeal against cassation ruling for improper use of Art. 437 § 2 CPC to challenge merits.