Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
III PZP 4/12 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court rules lawyer travel costs to court hearings are necessary process expenses under Civil Procedure Code.

Numéro de cause III PZP 4/12
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether lawyer travel expenses to court hearings constitute necessary process costs. The lower court had previously denied such costs based on an earlier precedent, while the client argued that travel is an inherent part of legal representation. The Court overruled the prior decision, establishing that travel expenses are valid costs under the Civil Procedure Code.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 98 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.: Travel expenses for a lawyer or legal representative to attend court hearings are included in the necessary costs for the purposeful pursuit of rights and defense.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
civil procedure code process costs lawyer travel expenses court hearings necessary costs legal representative Supreme Court ruling

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 98 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.
art. 390 k.p.c.
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 98 k.p.c
art. 98 § 2 k.p.c
art. 98 § 3 k.p.c
art. 98 § 1 k.p.c
art. 390 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet