Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 62/11 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court quashes appeal decision rejecting request for reasoned judgment due to missed deadline.

Numéro de cause II UZ 62/11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision rejecting the applicant's request for a reasoned judgment and service of the verdict. The applicant argued that the deadline for filing an appeal should only begin after the court addressed the request to restore the missed deadline for the reasoned judgment. The court held that the appellate court failed to evaluate whether the missed deadline was caused by the applicant's fault, violating the duty of due diligence.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c. - The court must assess whether a missed procedural deadline was caused by the party's fault; failure to do so prevents proper review of the decision rejecting the request for a reasoned judgment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procedural deadline reasoned judgment duty of due diligence fault-based dismissal appellate review service of verdict restoration of term

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet