III SK 5/11 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court ruled that a regulatory body's summons to submit tariffs cannot legally count as revoking a prior exemption from that duty.

Numéro de cause III SK 5/11

Autorité / Tribunal Sąd Najwyższy

Juridiction

Pologne (PL)

Date de la décision 2011-09-20

Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the lower court's decision and the regulator's refusal to approve tariffs. The plaintiff argued that a summons to submit tariffs constituted a revocation of a previous exemption from this duty under the Energy Law. The court held that the statute does not define the procedure for revoking such exemptions, requiring the revocation to occur in the same manner as the original exemption. Consequently, the court determined the summons was insufficient to legally revoke the exemption.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 49 ust. 1 Prawa energetycznego; Art. 47 ust. 1 i 2 Prawa energetycznego: A regulatory body's summons to submit tariffs cannot be equated with a revocation of a prior exemption from that duty unless the revocation follows the same procedural manner as the original exemption.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

Energy Law Tariff Approval Regulatory Exemption Procedural Revocation Administrative Procedure Energy Market Summons Validity

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 49 ust. 1 of the Energy Law

Art. 47 ust. 1 and 2 of the Energy Law

Art. 398 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Art. 479 § 3 in conjunction with Art. 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Art. 108 § 1 in conjunction with Art. 391 § 1 in conjunction with Art. 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure

art. 105 k.p

art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

art. 365 § 1 k.p.c

art. 366 k.p.c

art. 378 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on set-off claim, ruling administrative decision is binding precedent.

Supreme Court allows severance pay denial for gross misconduct but requires proof of actual loss for gross negligence.

Cassation appeal dismissed; Supreme Court held previous judgment binds parties regarding indefinite-term employment status.

Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling on co-ownership claims for former workplace apartments under Housing Co. Act.

Supreme Court voids appeal ruling due to conflict between binding precedent and material res judicata principles.

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding scope of res judicata and material force of prior judgment.

Texte complet