Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 17/11 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court partially allowed lawyer's wage claim, dismissing statute of limitations interruption due to vague settlement summons.

Numéro de cause II PK 17/11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's dismissal of Alicja C.'s wage claim against Group L. SA, ordering a retrial on specific salary equalization and court representation costs. While the court found the statutory basis for the wage claim valid, it ruled that the settlement summons failed to interrupt the statute of limitations because it lacked specific details on the underlying cases and amounts. Consequently, the claim was deemed time-barred, and the case was remanded for further proceedings on the remaining issues.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 244 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 291 § 1 k.p.; Art. 295 § 1 k.p.: A settlement summons interrupts the statute of limitations only if it clearly identifies the specific claims, their amounts, and the period of enforceability; a vague summons regarding court representation costs does not constitute such an interruption.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
statute of limitations settlement summons lawyer remuneration court representation costs remedial proceedings statutory interpretation labor law

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 244 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 291 § 1 k.p.
Art. 295 § 1 k.p.
Art. 773 k.p.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39821 k.p.c.
art. 291 § 1 k.p
art. 185 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
V CSK 238/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; failure to specify claims prevents statute of limitations interruption under Civil Code.
III PK 22/06
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; labor court cannot set salary within statutory limits if regulations exist.
I PK 58/02
II PK 180/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where employee failed to prove discrimination grounds required by law.
I PK 131/08
I PK 28/09
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; plaintiff failed to prove discrimination or equal treatment violation regarding salary.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet