Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PK 238/10 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; economic layoff based on age and extra income is not discriminatory.

Numéro de cause I PK 238/10
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement after his contract was terminated. The lower court found that the employer's decision to fire the youngest employee, who possessed a farm and other income, was justified by the company's economic restructuring and the ease of re-employment for younger workers. The court ruled that age and additional income are not discriminatory criteria in this context because they relate to the objective goal of minimizing reintegration difficulties during a layoff.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 30 § 4 k.p.c.; Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 113 k.p.; Art. 183a § 1 k.p.: An employer is not required to disclose specific selection criteria when terminating a contract due to economic hardship, and age or additional income are not considered discriminatory grounds if the selection aims to facilitate the employee's re-employment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
economic restructuring termination of contract discriminatory criteria reinstatement claim equal treatment layoff selection cassation appeal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 113 k.p.
Art. 183a § 1 k.p.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 45 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PK 107/10
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding dismissal for loss of trust and false statements.
I CSK 679/09
Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling dismissing liquidator's fee claim, allowing re-trial on contract validity.
I UK 76/10
Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling on disability pension due to procedural flaws and lack of specific findings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet