Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 33/10 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court quashes lower court ruling for failing to apply general law when collective agreement claim is unjustified.

Numéro de cause I PK 33/10
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim for a higher statutory severance pay. The plaintiff argued that a collective agreement provided for a 500% severance, but the lower courts incorrectly ruled that the employee was no longer a 'worker' upon reaching retirement age. The Supreme Court held that when a collective agreement claim is unjustified, the court must apply general statutory provisions instead of relying on a superficial linguistic interpretation of the agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 14 ust. 3 z.u.z.p.; Art. 921 § 1 k.p.; When a claim based on a collective agreement is unjustified, the court must evaluate the request based on general mandatory provisions rather than a narrow linguistic interpretation of the agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
collective agreement interpretation severance pay entitlement employee status after retirement statutory severance provisions casation review standard systematic legal interpretation unjustified claim dismissal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 14 ust. 3 z.u.z.p.
Art. 921 § 1 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 921 § 1 k.p
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet