Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PK 186/09 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on work accident claim, ruling delivery of termination notice was not an external cause of injury.

Numéro de cause I PK 186/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the recognition of a work accident caused by the delivery of a termination notice. The plaintiff argued this event triggered his health deterioration, while the defendant contended the illness had an independent character and the payment was already made. The court ruled that the delivery of the notice does not constitute an external cause of a work accident under the relevant social insurance laws.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych: The delivery of a written employer's declaration of termination of the employment contract does not constitute an external cause of a work accident.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
work accident recognition external cause requirement termination notice delivery social insurance liability independent illness character cassation appeal dismissal scope of first instance judgment

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 30 października 2002 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 366 k.p.c.
art. 291 § 1 k.p
art. 6 k.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
IV CZ 90/88
I CZ 115/00
CKN 825/97
II CKN 600/07
III CK 323/04
Supreme Court allows appeal against default judgment for construction work, citing procedural errors and missing evidence.
II PK 235/07
Improper authorization of counsel does not equate to failure to show authorization; lack of signature is not fatal. The cassation complaint was dismissed.
II CSK 177/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding psychiatric hospitalization, ruling first-instance procedural defects fall under appeal review, not cassation.
V CKN 1046/00
III CZP 8/93
II UK 381/03

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet