Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 205/09 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee transfer did not occur as he was not yet employed by new company.

Numéro de cause II PK 205/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking compensation for wrongful termination and unpaid vacation. The court found that although the employee managed the transfer of assets, he was not legally employed by the new company until after the transfer occurred. Consequently, the statutory conditions for a transfer of the workplace under Article 231 of the Labor Code were not met. The court ruled that the lower court correctly determined the employment relationship began only after the asset transfer, invalidating the claim for transfer-related compensation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 231 k.p.; A transfer of the workplace requires the employee to be legally employed by the transferring entity at the time of transfer, which was not established in this case as the employment contract was concluded post-transfer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transfer of workplace labor code article 231 employee status timing cassation appeal dismissal employment relationship establishment management role transfer vacation compensation claim

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 231 k.p.
Art. 551 k.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
art. 231 k.p
art. 551 k.c
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 52 § 2 k.p
art. 36 k.p
art. 56 k.p
art. 36 § 11 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II CZP 44/00
I PK 601/02
III CZP 44/00
Cooperative cannot transfer entire business as non-monetary contribution if it ceases statutory economic activity.
V CSK 156/07
Cassation appeal dismissed; court held factual takeover defines employer under Art. 231 K.P. and cassation court lacks jurisdiction to examine uncharged material law violations.
I PK 75/06
Labor law ruling: Failure to consult unions does not invalidate transfer of workplace to new employer.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet