Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 215/08 Généré par l'IA

Invalid employment contract does not preclude later per facta concludentia agreement on same or different terms.

Numéro de cause I PK 215/08
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the validity of a subsequent employment agreement. The lower court found that the invalid 2005 contract did not prevent a new agreement from being formed per facta concludentia based on the parties' conduct. The court upheld this decision, noting that the employer's board had previously evaluated the employee's qualifications positively and that the invalidity of the initial contract did not bar future employment relations.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 379 § 1 k.s.h.; An invalid employment contract does not exclude the subsequent conclusion of an employment agreement per facta concludentia on the terms specified in the invalid agreement or on different terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
invalid employment contract per facta concludentia subsequent agreement labor law Supreme Court cassation appeal employer liability

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 379 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 368 § 4 k.s.h.
Art. 370 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 483 k.s.h.
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 227 k.p.c.
Art. 232 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 378 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 381 k.p.c.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet