Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 28/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court quashes appeal court order for failure to inform unrepresented party of right to reasoned judgment.

Numéro de cause II UZ 28/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the appeal court's decision rejecting the insured's request to restore the deadline for requesting a reasoned judgment. The insured, acting without legal counsel, missed the deadline after being told the judgment was final but could be appealed via an attorney, without receiving specific instructions on requesting the reasoning. The court held that informing a party about the mandatory attorney requirement does not equate to informing them of their right to a reasoned judgment, necessitating a new hearing to assess the missed deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 327 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 387 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.: In proceedings where an appeal is dismissed, the court must inform an unrepresented party of their right to request a reasoned judgment; mere notification of the attorney requirement does not satisfy this obligation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
reasoned judgment request restoration of deadline unrepresented party mandatory attorney rule procedural notification

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 327 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 871 k.p.c
art. 387 § 1 k.p.c
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet