II PK 198/07
Généré par l'IA
Dividends are a separate profit from shares and constitute damage when shares are unlawfully withheld from heirs.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the State's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling awarding damages to heirs for withheld shares. The court held that dividends represent a distinct profit from the shares themselves, not merely a component of the share price. Consequently, the failure to issue shares deprived the heirs of both the shares and the dividends they would have earned, justifying full compensation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 361 § 2 k.c.; Art. 398 § 13 k.p.c.; Dividends constitute a separate profit from shares and are not absorbed by their value; therefore, withholding shares unlawfully damages the holder's right to dividends, entitling them to full compensation for lost income.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
dividends as separate profit
unlawful withholding of shares
heirs' rights to compensation
separate value of dividends
causal link in damages
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 361 § 2 k.c.
Art. 398 § 13 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Ustawa z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
art. 471 k.c
art. 361 § 2 k.c
art. 361 k.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAuchwała Sądu Najwyższy z 30 stycznia 2007 r., III CZP 130/06
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 12 października 2007 r., IV CZ 28/07
I PK 272/02
Failure to promptly notify employees of rights to acquire shares justifies compensation for lost share entitlement.
I PK 574/02
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, holding that missing employment certificate did not forfeit share acquisition rights under privatization law.
I PK 75/03
I PK 291/03
Company formed from state privatization owes compensation for employee rights violation under Civil Code Art. 471.
III CZP 130/06
Supreme Court allows one lawyer's fee for multiple co-plaintiffs when they win a case together.