Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 175/07 Généré par l'IA

Cassation court dismissed claim for mining pension due to lack of high probability of meeting work conditions.

Numéro de cause II PK 175/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a claim for a mining pension denied by the lower courts. The plaintiff argued that he would have qualified for early retirement had he continued working underground, but the court found insufficient evidence. The court ruled that merely showing a possibility of employment is inadequate; there must be a high probability that the plaintiff would have met all statutory requirements, including health and job continuity, which could not be established given his medical history and the nature of underground work.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 361 § 1 k.c.; Art. 34 ust. 1, 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z FUS; The court must establish a high probability, not just a possibility, that the claimant would have fulfilled all conditions for the pension, including health and job continuity.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
adequate causal link mining pension entitlement high probability standard underground work conditions medical incapacity evidence early retirement requirements causation in tort

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 361 § 1 k.c.
art. 34 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z FUS
art. 361 § 1 k.c
art. 231 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 361 k.c
art. 415 k.c
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PK 166/04
Supreme Court dismisses cassation against second-instance labor court for remanding case due to procedural error.
III CZP 100/88
III CZP 59/90
I CK 217/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on property ownership, ruling factual findings lack res judicata effect.
III CK 101/05
Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling for damages due to bank's wrongful acceptance of invalid beneficiary declaration.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet