Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PZ 17/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal by attorney for missing scope when full case is challenged under Civil Procedure Code.

Numéro de cause II PZ 17/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland allowed the appellant's appeal, overturning the lower court's dismissal based on a missing scope of challenge. The lower court rejected the appeal because the lawyer failed to specify the disputed amount, citing procedural defects under the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court ruled that challenging a judgment in its entirety implicitly defines the scope, rendering the specific amount requirement unnecessary when the full case is contested.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 368 § 1 pkt 1, 5 k.p.c.; Art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.: When a party challenges a judgment in its entirety, the scope of the challenge is deemed to cover the entire judgment, and the specific designation of the scope in the appeal petition is not required.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
scope of challenge appeal petition requirements attorney procedural defect full case challenge Civil Procedure Code dismissal of appeal implicit scope definition

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c.
art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 378 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 16 k.p.c.
art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 3701 k.p.c

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet