Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
III UZP 1/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court rejects legal question submission for emerytury case due to procedural error and lack of abstract legal issue.

Numéro de cause III UZP 1/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court refused to accept the legal question submitted by the Court of Appeal in the Anna J. social security case. The Court of Appeal incorrectly formulated the question regarding an advocate's pension rights and issued the submission order during a public session designated solely for announcing a verdict, violating procedural rules. Consequently, the Supreme Court determined that the question was not abstract, did not raise serious legal doubts, and effectively sought to decide the specific case rather than establish a general legal rule.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 316 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 148 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 178 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP; A legal question submitted to the Supreme Court must be abstract, raise serious doubts, and be necessary for the case's resolution, failing if it merely seeks to decide the specific matter or is issued during a session not designated for such proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
legal question submission procedural error abstract legal issue serious legal doubts public session rules Supreme Court jurisdiction social security pension

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 148 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 178 ust. 1 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 148 k.p.c
art. 326 § 1 k.p.c
art. 225 k.p.c
art. 316 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III CZP 64/78
III CZP 9/03

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet