Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I BP 16/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal as inadmissible due to lack of proven damage and procedural standing.

Numéro de cause I BP 16/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a second-instance court order rejecting an appeal. The plaintiff argued that the first-instance decision was delivered late, causing him to miss a deadline and lose the right to early retirement. The court rejected this claim because the contested order was merely procedural and did not directly cause the alleged loss of retirement rights, which remained hypothetical. Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to prove that the specific second-instance order caused the damage, as the injury stemmed from a different earlier ruling.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal against a second-instance order dismissing an appeal is inadmissible if the plaintiff cannot prove direct damage caused by that specific order, as the order is procedural and the alleged loss is hypothetical.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cassation appeal inadmissibility procedural order dismissal proof of damage requirement causal link failure hypothetical loss rejection second instance appeal early retirement rights

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4248 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 k.p.c
art. 4245 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 31 stycznia 2006 r., IV CNP 38/05, OSNC 2006 nr 7-8, poz. 141
wyroki Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 kwietnia 1999 r., II UKN 619/98, OSNAPiUS 2000 nr 11, 5 poz. 439
wyroki Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 grudnia 1998 r., II UKN 357/98, OSNAPiUS 2000 nr 3, poz. 112
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 27 stycznia 2006 r., II CNP 18/05, OSNC 2006 nr 7-8, poz. 139
IV CNP 38/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-confirmation of loss under Art. 4245 § 1(4) CPC due to lack of proven causation.
II CNP 18/05

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet