I PZ 1/07
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; filing deadline not extended by request for court-appointed counsel.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a request for a court-appointed lawyer. The appellant argued that the filing deadline should start from the date of the lawyer's appointment rather than the original notice. The court held that the statutory deadline runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a subsequent request for counsel, though such a request may justify restoring the deadline.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: The time limit for filing an appeal runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a party's request for a court-appointed lawyer, although such a request may serve as grounds for restoring the deadline.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
court-appointed lawyer
filing deadline
appeal procedure
time limit interruption
restoration of deadline
court-appointed counsel
service of notice
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 871 § 1 k.p.c
art. 130 § 5 k.p.c
art. 5 k.p.c
art. 394 § 2 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAII CZ 35/97
II CZ 106/98
I CZ 76/00
II CZ 81/02
V CZ 42/03
I CZ 4/04